Australian Attorneys are the Primary Bullshit Artists

By 14 March 2019KEY ARTICLES

Australian Attorneys are the Primary Bullshit Artists

Published on 19th November 2017

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM

Enter more text here

once I upload the additional evidence, the nature and scope of the fraud will be blatantly obvious 🙂


The Police and/or their Investigator agents are blatantly interfering with judicial proceedings that I am involved with in Singapore and Australia. When I am seeking legal representation even from UK Attorneys, they seem fixated with these non-UK jurisdictions and it seems that there is a deliberate attempt to fabricate something massive against me to cause me unnecessary hardship and ‘soften me up’.

I have worked with Law Enforcement agents who are part of Criminal Investigations (such as Intellectual Property Theft, Money Laundering), and Covert Surveillance (usually Electronic) is a very powerful tool.

However Police tend to stick to their protocols and apply them religiously. They are frequently too rigid in situations that are evolving against the wind. I of course know what these protocols are so identification of signatures is easy 🙂

I also record my calls and take people in directions that they do not wish to go in – my interviewing technique and unscheduled questions often exposes even the best without difficulty, and in such an insidious manner that they do not know what is actually going on around them. I can think incredibly fast when not having Transient Ischaemic Attacks 🙂

Australian Attorneys are the Primary Bullshit Artists

Nick Sevdalis has obviously been approached and refers to ‘stress-causing issues’ occurring in London in relation to me. Yes such issues would be stressful for Asian Parents who do not understand complex matters and think they know more about their genius son’s work than he does 🙂

But stressful for me with the Forensic Evidence I have? No way, Jose! No-one has told me about anything and my conclusions are based on forensic evidence…

Yet another comment about ‘Problems in London’. When the Police and/or Investigators are going around shit-stirring to such a degree no wonder my Attorneys thought I was a criminal and messed up all the cases! The mess that has been caused is directly due to Tortious Interference by the Police and/or Investigators! And this of course is a separate Cause of Action, both against the Police and the Attorney!

So is there an issue or not, or this is a game to get me all panicky and ‘spill beans’, and then using my responses as Probable Cause – frankly I do not care either but if the Attorney has been approached and is coming out with such comments, then I need to find out about the underlying matter.

Two scenarios fit this – (a) there is an actual issue, everyone knows about it via unlawful interference and they are speaking to me in a contrived way or (b) there is no issue but everyone is feigning an issue to see how I would react.

The bottom line is however, that the mere fact that all my attorneys have repeating the signature themes at the same time mean a common source. They are literally LinkedIn 🙂

and are obsessed with my line of work:-

Pandora's Box

I read an article in the UK Guardian today entitled 'WikiLeaks publishes 'biggest ever leak of secret CIA documents'. As usual journalists are...


Police lying to suspects to get a confession is lawful and extremely effective.


Police manipulating third parties into committing crimes against me, which blatantly Perverts the Course of Justice, is nothing short of ridiculous.

Police asking my lawyers and accountants to effectively interview me without caution is also foolish. Unless I have been cautioned I will say whatever I like which means nothing!

[further updates in progress…]

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM